Franklin says, “Only two things are certain: death and taxes.”
“Only two things are certain: death and taxes.” Benjamin Franklin’s famous line, penned in 1789 to defend the government’s authority to levy taxes for the common good, resonates more than ever in California. Here, taxes have become not just inevitable but contested terrain, a flashpoint for debates about fairness, economic growth, and the role of government.
What began as a policy disagreement has hardened into a full-scale political clash, pitting Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom against some of his most influential labor allies and progressive lawmakers in a battle that could define California’s tax system for decades.
At the center of the fight: the proposed 2026 Billionaire Tax Act, a one-time wealth tax aimed at California’s richest residents — framed by supporters as a necessary response to soaring inequality and looming public-service shortfalls.
Newsom’s Opposition
“California must protect its economy and the investments that create jobs. This billionaire tax, while well-intentioned, risks driving away investment, forcing businesses and wealthy individuals to leave, and ultimately hurting the very programs it’s meant to fund.”
Governor Gavin Newsom has strongly opposed the proposed California billionaire wealth tax, pledging to do everything possible to “protect” the state from it. Because this is a citizen-led ballot initiative, Newsom cannot formally veto it. Instead, his administration is actively working to defeat the measure before it reaches voters.
Newsom’s opposition stems from several key points:
- Active Opposition: Newsom has vowed to fight the measure if it qualifies for the November 2026 ballot, stating his office is working to kill it.
- Reasons for Opposition: He believes the tax is badly drafted and could prompt ultra-wealthy residents to leave, taking investments and jobs with them and harming California’s economy.
- Not a Veto: Lacking formal veto power over a ballot initiative, Newsom’s strategy involves campaigning publicly against it and working behind the scenes to prevent it from reaching the ballot.
The proposed tax would impose a one-time 5% levy on the net worth of California residents with over $1 billion in assets, championed by SEIU-UHW. Its purpose is to raise significant revenue for healthcare, housing, and other social services, especially amid potential federal funding cuts. Although still collecting signatures to qualify for the ballot, the proposal has already prompted some billionaires, including Larry Page, to reportedly restructure holdings or move assets out of the state.
What the Billionaire Tax Would Do
The initiative would levy a one-time 5% tax on Californians with net worth exceeding $1 billion, directly targeting accumulated wealth rather than income from labor. Roughly 200 people would be affected. Advocates estimate the measure could generate tens of billions of dollars, with much of the revenue directed to healthcare, housing, infrastructure, and other social programs.
Organizations actively supporting the tax include SEIU-UHW (Service Employees International Union – United Healthcare Workers West), Fight Inequality Alliance, progressive lawmakers like Assemblymember Alex Lee, and economic justice organizations such as the California Alliance for Economic Equity.
The Middle Class vs. the Ultra-Wealthy
To understand the appeal of the tax, proponents often point to what middle-class Californians already pay. A family of four earning $120,000 a year typically pays:
- $8,000–$10,000 in federal income taxes, after deductions and child credits
- $9,200 in payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare
- $4,000–$5,000 in California state income taxes
- Thousands in sales taxes, depending on spending
- $6,000–$8,000 in property taxes, if they own a home
Altogether, that family contributes $30,000 to $35,000 annually — roughly 25–30% of their income — to keep schools, hospitals, roads, and public safety operational. By contrast, billionaires pay differently. Much of their wealth exists as assets, which can grow by billions with little or no tax impact. When income is realized, it is often taxed at lower capital gains rates. Analyses suggest billionaires may pay an effective tax rate of 20–24% on total economic income — sometimes proportionally less than middle-class households.
Visual Comparison: Middle Class vs. Billionaires
*Bars are proportional estimates to visualize the difference in tax burden between middle-class families and billionaires.
📊 Estimated Allocation of Billionaire Tax Revenue ($22–30B)*■ Healthcare/Medi-Cal – 35%
- ■ Homelessness/Housing – 25%
- ■ High-Speed Rail – 20%
- ■ Senior Programs & Community Health – 15%
- ■ Other/Admin – 5%.
- *Data estimates for illustrative purposes. This visual shows how the proposed billionaire tax could fund key public programs in California.
How Much Would a Billionaire Actually Pay?
To put the proposed tax in perspective, imagine a billionaire with a net worth of $5 billion — a mix of stock holdings, private business stakes, and other investments. Under the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act, a one-time 5% tax on net worth would amount to:
- 5% of $5 billion = $250 million
That leaves the billionaire with $4.75 billion — still more money than most people could imagine spending in several lifetimes. Proponents argue that the tax is designed to collect a meaningful contribution from extreme wealth without threatening the billionaire’s lifestyle or ability to invest in businesses, philanthropy, or California’s economy.
The Case for the Tax
Backers argue the system is unbalanced. California relies heavily on income and consumption taxes, which weigh most heavily on workers and middle-class families, while allowing extreme wealth to grow largely untaxed. The billionaire tax could fund essential services:
- Healthcare — stabilize Medi-Cal, protect in-home care for seniors, maintain rural and urban hospitals
- Support for seniors — expand prescription assistance, community health programs, and aging-in-place initiatives
- Homelessness — build permanent supportive housing, expand linked mental health and addiction services, and provide more predictable funding for local governments
- Infrastructure — accelerate completion of high-speed rail between San Francisco and Los Angeles (“supertrain”) and create thousands of union jobs while reducing emissions
Why Billionaires Most Likely Won’t Leave
Even with higher taxes, California remains extremely attractive to tech entrepreneurs and investors. The state actively supports the tech industry through government partnerships, massive infrastructure investments, targeted tax incentives, and workforce development, especially in AI and quantum computing.
- AI and Emerging Tech: Programs like the California Innovation Council and Quantum California align research with industry, keeping California at the cutting edge.
- Government Adoption: AI projects like “Poppy,” a digital assistant for state employees, and AI-driven traffic management showcase California as an early adopter.
- Infrastructure & Investment: Hosting the National Semiconductor Technology Center and investing in high-capacity data centers supports advanced computing needs.
- Workforce Development: Partnerships with Google, Adobe, IBM, and Microsoft provide AI training to over two million students in public schools and universities.
- Financial Incentives: The California Competes Tax Credit and R&D credits reward business expansion and innovation within the state.
These factors suggest the one-time tax, while significant, is unlikely to outweigh the benefits of staying in California.
The Case Against the Tax
Governor Newsom and other opponents maintain that the tax is economically risky and could discourage investment, reduce state revenues, and trigger complex legal challenges. Critics also argue that one-time wealth taxes are a short-term fix that do not address California’s long-term budget volatility.
Labor Pushback
“Deeply disappointing,” said Suzanne Jimenez, chief of staff for SEIU-UHW, claiming the governor prioritizes a handful of ultra-wealthy individuals over millions of Californians in need of healthcare, housing, and other services.
Proponents are moving ahead with signature-gathering to place the measure directly on the November 2026 ballot, bypassing the Legislature and the governor entirely.
A National Perspective: Keystone Research Center
The billionaire tax is similar to the wealth tax proposed by Senator Elizabeth Warren during the 2020 presidential campaign. But unlike a pure wealth tax, it targets income generated by wealth — not labor — avoiding potential federal constitutional challenges.
“The billionaire tax is not only important to funding essential programs but is a good idea in itself. At a time of growing income and wealth inequality, and after decades of Republican tax cuts for the wealthy that have placed the burden on the middle class, the billionaire tax would be a huge step forward in making the tax system fairer.”
A Defining Moment for California
The billionaire tax debate is more than a fiscal argument. It is a test of California’s identity — and of how a deeply Democratic state balances economic growth with social equity. For Newsom, the fight reflects an effort to protect California’s economic engine and maintain fiscal stability. For labor and progressive activists, it is a stand on whether extreme wealth should play a larger role in funding the public good. As signature drives move forward and positions harden, California voters may soon be asked to decide whether Franklin’s maxim still applies — and who truly pays when the bill comes due.
Feature Image: Photo by Logan Voss.
Discover more from SW Newsmagazine
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
